I appreciate the dilemma that the gentleman has described. There is perhaps one other solution. Perhaps the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence would determine, and the leadership as well, to accept the gentleman from Vermont [Mr. Sanders] as a member of the committee, and that way he would be privy to the information that has been pointed out by the gentleman from Florida [Mr. Goss] as necessary to effect a specific solution. Because right now there is not only no way that the gentleman from Vermont [Mr. Sanders] can be specific to those seven excellent questions, but neither can any other Member in the House of Representatives who is not on the committee. I cannot come down here and say, 'Well, the National Reconnaissance Office is up by $1 billion, I want to cut $500 million there because they are spending it on this particular satellite that I do not think is helpful.' I can do none of that on the floor. I could not talk about the amount of money here if I had been up there to review the budget.
John Conyers: “I appreciate the dilemma that the gentleman has described. There is perhaps one other solution. Perhaps the Permanent…”
On the recordJuly 9, 1997
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the limitations faced by members of Congress regarding budget information.
Share
More from John Conyers
Oct 31, 2017
The Judiciary Committee has a central role in studying the issue of net neutrality and, more generally, competition on the Internet.
Oct 3, 2017
How much time remains on each side? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Michigan has 11\1/2\ minutes remaining and the gentlewoman from Georgia has 10\1/2\ minutes remaining.
Oct 3, 2017
I demand a recorded vote. A recorded vote was ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This will be a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 237, noes 189, not voting 7, as follows: [Roll No. 549] AYES--237…





