I have supported this legislation in the past because I am told it will improve the ability of Federal courts to handle complex multidistrict litigation arising from a common set of facts. But I do have some reservations about this bill. When Congress enacted the Multidistrict Litigation, MDL, statute 35 years ago, its purpose was not to impose an unfair burden on plaintiffs and their families. Congress made plain its insistence on preserving the ability of individual plaintiffs to have their eventual day in court in a Federal district courthouse reasonably close to their home. I want to make sure we continue to strike the right balance between emphasizing judicial economy and efficiency and preserving fundamental fairness during the critical trial phase. With this underlying goal in mind, I support this legislation. However, I hope the bill will continue to improve as it moves through the Senate and into Conference.
John Conyers: “I have supported this legislation in the past because I am told it will improve the ability of Federal courts to handle…”
On the recordApril 19, 2005
Source
govinfo.govShare
More from John Conyers
Oct 25, 2017
I demand a recorded vote. A recorded vote was ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 234, noes 187, not voting 11, as follows: [Roll No. 588] AYES--234…
Sep 27, 2017
The title is Serious Risks Presented by the Anti-Regulatory Agenda of the 115th Congress and the Trump administration.
Oct 24, 2017
My amendment would exempt from H.R. 732 settlement agreements that direct funds to remediate the indirect but catastrophic effects of unlawful conduct resulting in lead contamination in public drinking water. Lead contamination in public…
Nov 6, 2017
I ask respectfully that we include relevant officials from the Department of Defense and the Air Force.





