I think in response to some of this questioning, suggested that the president can defend on the basis that the definition was changed--that is, the definition of sex''--and that the new definition may somehow have excluded a certain act or type of sex.
Share
More from John Conyers
In closing, I note that a broad coalition of public interest organizations, including Public Citizen, Americans for Financial Reform, the National Urban League, among others, strongly oppose H.R. 732. They warn: ``This measure would…
I demand a recorded vote. A recorded vote was ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 234, noes 187, not voting 11, as follows: [Roll No. 588] AYES--234…
It is incontrovertible that the United States since its founding has been a Nation of immigrants.
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: An Amendment Offered in Lieu of Amendment No. 2 Printed in Part A of House Report No. 115-363 Offered by…
Other voices in this conversation
