Political Quotes

On the recordFebruary 11, 2011
I am curious about the reference and surprised that my friend, the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, would come to the floor in this discussion and lift up the REINS Act as a way that we may prevent the regulations for inhibiting jobs. {time} 0920 Dear friends, under the REINS Act we would be violating the separation of powers doctrine that I am sure that Members of the Judiciary Committee, particularly my friend the chairman and ranking member for many years, would be familiar with. The REINS Act, which we have under consideration in our committee, would be the last thing we would want to enact in this Congress to create more jobs--the last thing. I am surprised that the separations of powers doctrine is now required for me to explain on the House floor, about a 1988 case entitled Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654, that the REINS Act would be constitutionally infirm and that the REINS Act would be a terrible thing for us to do if you are serious about jobs. Supporters of the REINS Act argue that Congress, and the chairman has said this, that Congress has delegated too much authority over the years to what they call ``unelected bureaucrats'' in the executive branch--of course, they are appointed--creating thereby a lack of accountability among Federal agencies and resulting in burdensome regulations. The REINS Act does not address even the problem that they are arguing about.…
Said by
John Conyers
Democratic · Michigan

Share & report

More from John Conyers

Mar 10, 2017

I am very concerned that H.R. 720 may have a serious, deleterious impact on the ability of individuals to protect their civil and constitutional rights in Federal court. This is a point that has been emphasized on this side ever since we…

govinfo.gov
Feb 6, 2017

In 2014, in a unanimous ruling delivered by Chief Justice Roberts, the Supreme Court concluded that the police may not search a cell phone without first demonstrating probable cause. Citing an obvious Fourth Amendment interest--namely, the…

govinfo.gov
Apr 26, 2017

I thank the gentlewoman for yielding. This amendment makes clear that nothing in the bill would impact the Library of Congress' mandatory deposit requirement. For over 100 years, the Library has built its world-class collection, in large…

govinfo.gov
Apr 26, 2017

I am pleased to yield 2 minutes to the distinguished gentlewoman from California (Ms. Judy Chu).

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation