This bipartisan amendment makes a technical revision to H.R. 1249. It addresses the confusion regarding the calculation of the filing period for patent term extension applications under the Hatch- Waxman Act. By eliminating confusion regarding the deadline for patent term extension applications, this amendment provides the certainty necessary to encourage costly investments in life-saving medical research. It also is consistent with the only court case to address this issue entitled, The Medicines Co. v. Kappos. As a result of this amendment, all applications and cases will be treated henceforth in the same manner. I also want to point out that this exact language has passed the House overwhelmingly on a voice vote in the past, and the prior version of the provision was unanimously passed by the House on two previous occasions and was also in another instance voted out by the Senate Judiciary Committee on a bipartisan basis. It was also accepted in a voice vote by the House Judiciary Committee at a markup earlier this year. {time} 1510 Madam Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.
Share
More from John Conyers
we want to keep punishing children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren for the sins of the original person back over 50 years ago
For me personally, I've long been reluctant to amend the Constitution to require a balanced budget, because such an amendment could have a devastating consequence for millions of Americans.
In closing, I note that a broad coalition of public interest organizations, including Public Citizen, Americans for Financial Reform, the National Urban League, among others, strongly oppose H.R. 732. They warn: ``This measure would…
My amendment would exempt from H.R. 469 settlement agreements and consent decrees intended to prevent discrimination based on race, religion, national origin, or other protected category. Given the often systemic nature of discriminatory…





