Political Quotes

On the recordJanuary 26, 1995
I would like to review the important factor of judicial review under the proposed amendment. As currently drafted, the Barton substitute is totally silent on the issue of judicial review, creating what could be a serious legal quagmire. One potential uncertainty concerns the applicability of the political question doctrine, which is designed to restrain the judiciary from inappropriate interference in the business of other branches of the Federal Government. We will not have to worry with that doctrine anymore because we are inviting the judiciary to come into the legislative business of Government, and we are not even giving any direction as we amend the Constitution of the United States to create this exception. Many scholars have indicated that the political question doctrine is unlikely to limit judicial intervention in the present case. An additional area of confusion relates to judicial limitations concerning standing. While a taxpayer may not be able to show sufficient injury to have standing to bring suit in Federal court that would allow him to challenge congressional failure to comply with the balanced budget amendment, standing may be far more compelling if sought by a Member of Congress or an entire House of Congress or an entitled recipient who has been denied benefits as a result of the questionable impoundment of funds. This is certain to be a thicket of confusion and tangled litigations and appeals.
Said by
John Conyers
Democratic · Michigan

Editor's note · Context

Discussing concerns about judicial review in relation to a proposed constitutional amendment.

Share

More from John Conyers

Oct 25, 2017

I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: An Amendment Offered in Lieu of Amendment No. 2 Printed in Part A of House Report No. 115-363 Offered by…

govinfo.gov
Sep 9, 2019

You got a good point, but we are going to be able to get it passed. Let's let it go to the courts.

congress.gov
Nov 6, 2017

He should have been prevented from purchasing firearms from licensed gun dealers via the Brady background check system.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation