On the recordMarch 2, 1995
And that would reduce a number of, a large number, of claims that might be, while they may not be called frivolous, they certainly might not have the merit that the 30 percent threshold would have?
Source
govinfo.govJohn Conyers: “And that would reduce a number of, a large number, of claims that might be, while they may not be called frivolous, they…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a proposed threshold for claims.
Share
More from John Conyers
Oct 24, 2017
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Michigan will be postponed. Announcement by the Acting Chair The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to…
Oct 24, 2017
Members of the House, this amendment makes a bad bill even worse. To begin with, it would prohibit cy-pres distributions pursuant to which parties attempt to find the next best use of funds that remain after a class action settlement has…
Oct 31, 2017
The Judiciary Committee has a central role in studying the issue of net neutrality and, more generally, competition on the Internet.
Oct 3, 2017
How much time remains on each side? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Michigan has 11\1/2\ minutes remaining and the gentlewoman from Georgia has 10\1/2\ minutes remaining.
Other voices in this conversation
