I rise today to put into the Record a letter that I have sent to the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense asking that we investigate or have investigated the allegations of conflict of interest and other possible misconduct involving Mr. Richard N. Perle, formerly chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board. As a special government employee, he is caught by all the ethics rules that preclude and severely limit his ability to operate with businesses connected with the military. Madam Speaker, I include for the Record this letter. The material referred to is as follows: House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary, Washington, DC, March 24, 2003. Hon. Joseph E. Schmitz, Office of the Inspector General, Department of Defense, The Pentagon, Washington, DC. Dear General Schmitz: I am writing to request that your office immediately open an investigation into allegations of conflict of interest and other misconduct involving Richard N. Perle, Chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board. As a result of this position, Mr. Perle is considered a ``special government employee,'' and is subject to government ethics prohibition--both regulatory and criminal--on using public office for private gain.
John Conyers: “I rise today to put into the Record a letter that I have sent to the Office of the Inspector General of the Department…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing allegations of misconduct involving Richard N. Perle during a speech in the House of Representatives.
Share
More from John Conyers
In my role as a member of the House Committee on the Judiciary, I have always taken a serious view of my oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigations. It is vitally important that we keep a close watch on the activities of law…
I am pleased to yield 1 minute to the distinguished gentlewoman from Washington (Ms. DelBene). Ms. DelBENE. Madam Speaker, today I rise for Stephanie from my district. This is her story. Stephanie and her husband were building their…
Members of the House, this amendment makes a bad bill even worse. To begin with, it would prohibit cy-pres distributions pursuant to which parties attempt to find the next best use of funds that remain after a class action settlement has…





