The clarity provided by the court is to affirm what I and the vast majority of my colleagues have also said since the beginning, which is that it's inappropriate for any one state to weigh in and make a decisive position on such a thorny legal issue.
Jocelyn Benson: “The clarity provided by the court is to affirm what I and the vast majority of my colleagues have also said since the…”
On the recordMarch 3, 2024
Source
transcripts.cnn.comEditor's note · Context
Jocelyn Benson discusses the Supreme Court's ruling and its implications for state authority regarding election issues.
Share
More from Jocelyn Benson
Sep 7, 2026
I'm really proud that our elections have been ranked among the most secure and accessible in the nation," Benson said.
Sep 29, 2026
Trump started this disaster, and if he and John James want to lower costs — they need to end it. That’s why I’m calling on the federal government to suspend its tax, not the state of Michigan.
Sep 11, 2026
We can protect public safety and personal privacy when government is transparent about how it uses technology and accountable for the power it has.
Sep 6, 2026
We've done more in Michigan than any other state to ensure that our rolls, our voter rolls, are accurate.





