I would ask my pro-life colleagues in the House to oppose the Campbell substitute, which is not a compromise but in fact would continue the current policy of abortion on demand around the world. Organizations can use simple bookkeeping to create the impression that U.S. taxpayer funds are not being used for abortion while in fact they are substituting other moneys for that purpose in their respective facilities around the world. I just hope that our pro-life Members of the House today will cast a strong vote against the Campbell substitute amendment.
James Barcia: “I would ask my pro-life colleagues in the House to oppose the Campbell substitute, which is not a compromise but in fact…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Campbell substitute amendment related to abortion policy.
Share
More from James Barcia
I rise in support of H.R. 394, and I want to offer a heartfelt thank-you to the chairman and the ranking minority member for their assistance in bringing this bill to the floor so quickly. This legislation, which will allow for a like…
I rise in support of H.R. 2733, the Enterprise Integration Act of 2002; and I thank the chairman of the Committee on Science, the gentleman from New York (Mr. Boehlert), and ranking member, the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Hall), for…
I rise in support of Title IX of the Conference Report and will limit my remarks to Title IX of the Agreement, which provides a three-year authorization for the research and development activities of the Federal Aviation Administration. I…
I also register my strong opposition to the Miller-Schumer amendment. Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong opposition to the Miller-Schumer amendment. It is an amendment that should not even be considered on an appropriations bill because it is…





