I would ask my pro-life colleagues in the House to oppose the Campbell substitute, which is not a compromise but in fact would continue the current policy of abortion on demand around the world. Organizations can use simple bookkeeping to create the impression that U.S. taxpayer funds are not being used for abortion while in fact they are substituting other moneys for that purpose in their respective facilities around the world. I just hope that our pro-life Members of the House today will cast a strong vote against the Campbell substitute amendment.
James Barcia: “I would ask my pro-life colleagues in the House to oppose the Campbell substitute, which is not a compromise but in fact…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Campbell substitute amendment related to abortion policy.
Share
More from James Barcia
I rise in support of H.R. 476, the Child Custody Protection Act... It will make it a Federal crime if an individual knowingly evades the laws of their State to seek an abortion for any mother 17 years of age or younger.
I think in some cases, I would say to the gentleman from Michigan [Mr. Conyers], it was a condition where severe financial pressures at the State level allowed for overcrowding of the prison system without adequate facilities to house all…
I rise in support of H.R. 4965, the Partial-Birth Abortion Act of 2002, and I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of this important legislation. Partial-birth abortions are most often performed in the second or third trimester, and I am…
I do not believe it totally eliminates parole. It says if you receive a determined number of years as your sentence, you shall serve 85 percent of that. In other words, if you receive a 10-year sentence, you should serve 8 rac{1}{2} years…





