Mr. Chairman, I rise today with disappointment. What was once a bipartisan bill is now a vehicle for policies that hinder our readiness and our defense capabilities. For almost 60 years, the NDAA has been a bipartisan endeavor. The NDAA fulfills the number one role of Congress: to provide for our common defense. But House Democratic leadership has turned this into yet another partisan bill. Let me be clear. I support a pay raise for our troops. I support providing all warfighters with the best resources available and a National Defense Authorization Act that empowers America and our allies. But, unfortunately, this bill, in its current form, poses a significant threat to our ability to carry out the national defense strategy now and in the years ahead. As President Reagan often said of our national defense strategy, ``Peace through strength.'' This bill does not--I repeat, does not-- show strength. We can and must do better.
Share & report
More from Jack Bergman
Mr. Speaker, I thank my friend and colleague from northern Minnesota for yielding. We share a lot of commonalities, and one is our love of the outdoors and of our national treasures. Mr. Speaker, I rise in favor today of H.R. 3195, the…
Mr. Chair, I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Page 31, line 13, after the dollar amount, insert ``(reduced by $20,000,000) (increased by…
Mr. Speaker, I thank the chairman for yielding the time. Mr. Speaker, it is crucial we are clear about the focus of today's debate. Our aim is not to remove vulnerable Americans from the government assistance programs they and their…
Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2025. I thank Chairman Rogers and Ranking Member Smith for their leadership in bringing this critical piece of bipartisan legislation for the national…





