On the recordDecember 11, 2025
this amendment would be more appropriate in a bipartisan Water Resources Development Act instead of a toxic, partisan assault on the Clean Water Act. Addressing the water supply needs of communities ought to be something we all agree on. While the gentleman's amendment would seek to address water supply needs through aquifer recharge projects conducted by the Army Corps of Engineers, it is being offered to a bill that will roll back clean water protections and increase costs for vulnerable communities. I urge the gentleman and other supporters of this amendment to engage with the bipartisan collaborative Water Resources Development Act process to move their proposal forward. We would love to talk to him about it. Mr. Chair, I oppose this amendment in this context, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Source
govinfo.gov




