On the recordMay 9, 2019
I rise because this motion to recommit is simply another attempt to take away protections for people with preexisting conditions. Madam Speaker, at face value, the amendment appears to maintain protections for people with preexisting conditions, but make no mistake, no matter the language included in this MTR, the goal of the 1332 guidance expands and promotes junk plans that discriminate against people with preexisting conditions. These plans also make comprehensive coverage for people with preexisting conditions more expensive. It is not enough to say, my colleagues, that you protect preexisting conditions. It is what happens on the ground that matters. {time} 1815 If my colleagues are serious about protecting Americans with preexisting conditions, I urge them to oppose this amendment, support the underlying bill, and join us in doing what the American public has made very clear they want. While Members of the other party may claim they are ready to work to protect individuals, their actions tell a different story. Madam Speaker, 2 years ago, exactly this week, most House Republicans voted overwhelmingly for a bill that would have gutted the ACA and weakened protections for people with preexisting conditions. My colleagues--including you, sir--stood on the White House lawn and celebrated that bill and would have made it more difficult for people with preexisting conditions.…





