today two and a half times more is spent on advertising and marketing of a product than is spent on research and development. What is more startling is the fact that according to a report released today by Family USA, we have companies that are having two or three times more in profits than they spend on research and development. This is no longer a research and development driven industry--which it needs to be. It has become much more about sales, marketing, and ``me too'' drugs rather than new breakthrough drugs. Today, Family USA showed us in a report that, for instance, America, last year--in 2001--had a profit, a net income, that was three times more than what they spent on R&D. Pfizerpen's was one and a half times more. Bristol-Myers was two times more in profit. What is also disturbing is that, while I appreciate the sympathies for the drug companies, it is really quite shocking when we look at where the money goes as opposed to R&D.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the disparity between pharmaceutical advertising spending and research and development funding.
Share
More from Debbie Stabenow
I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs be discharged from further consideration of H.R. 7438 and the Senate proceed to its immediate consideration. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the…
on behalf of the majority leader, I ask that the Chair execute the order of July 23, 2024, with respect to the Taylor nomination. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the nomination. The bill clerk read the nomination of Margaret…
I ask unanimous consent that the mandatory quorum call with respect to the cloture motion on the motion to proceed to H.R. 82 be waived. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. I suggest the absence of a quorum. The…





