First of all, it is very simple, I think. They don't want people to know the real facts about this new law. They want to be able to put ads on television that say same ``Medicare, but more benefits'' when, in fact, it is not the same Medicare, and certainly by 2010 it is not the same Medicare with more benefits. Some people won't be able in fact to be able to get those additional benefits. They are pushing out 2 years the implementation hoping they can campaign now and people will not really see what is taking effect.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about changes to Medicare and the implications of a new law.
Share
More from Debbie Stabenow
I ask unanimous consent that the motion to reconsider with respect to the Murphy nomination be considered made and laid upon the table. The PRESIDING OFFICER (Ms. Smith). Without objection, it is so ordered. ____________________
I ask unanimous consent that the committee-reported substitute amendment be withdrawn; that the Peters substitute amendment, which is at the desk, be considered and agreed to; that the bill, as amended, be considered read a third time and…
I love what you were saying about the fact that food at school should be no different than folding in the cost of riding the bus or some other service for children at school.





