This is a Robin Hood in reverse tax proposal. It is part of a package which is geared to help the rich and to hurt the poor. If we look, we will find that better than 50 percent of the tax reductions are going to go to those who earn more than $100,000 a year, the top 1 percent of the population of the country. Beyond that, it is going to cut programs which are important to people. It is going to cut the school lunch program. It is a bill which will cut the Women, Infants, and Children program. It is going to eliminate one of the most successful nutrition programs in the history of this country. It is a package that is going to cut school loans, college loans, college scholarships, and summer jobs. When we read this against the rest of the Contract on America, we will find out why this proposal should be rejected. I urge my colleagues to reject this tax cut. It is unfair. I urge my colleagues to wait and to support the Democratic alternative, which will be a better package, fairer to everyone.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a tax proposal during a House committee debate.
Share
More from Debbie Dingell
I'm a mom to a son with special needs. I'm also a nurse in primary care settings. My story is from the front lines. . . . If you cut Medicaid, Americans will die. People will get sick. They'll lose jobs. Some won't survive. It's not an…
I strongly urge our colleagues on both sides of the aisle to support H.R. 2482, and I yield back the balance of my time.
I have repeatedly urged the University to listen to the impacted community, be transparent, and answer basic questions about the impact of this project. Instead, they have rebuffed these concerns and are ignoring the pleas from residents…
No person should have to decide whether they pay their water bill or buy groceries.





