Mr. Speaker, it has been represented that Senator Rudman supports this. Let me read what he said about this with regard to the semi-autonomous weapons agency: ``We do not believe that the environmental health issues should be stripped from where they are and put within the agency for nuclear support. I would not support that kind of change because I know what we went through back in the 1980s.'' I would commend this to the reading of the chairman of the committee. Having said that, let us look who else is opposed to this outrage, the National Association of Attorneys General. The chairman sent them a letter, but they still oppose the bill: ``We urge you to oppose the provisions of title 32 that would weaken the existing internal and external oversight structure for DOE's safety and health operations. Title 32 of the defense authorization bill would impair State regulatory authority, eliminate DOE's internal oversight of environmental safety and health, and transfer responsibility for waste management and environmental restoration to the entity responsible for weapons production and development.''
On the recordSeptember 15, 1999
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing opposition to provisions in the defense authorization bill related to environmental safety and oversight.
Share
More from Debbie Dingell
Jun 16, 2026
No senior living on a fixed income should worry that turning on the faucet could mean falling behind on their medication, and no child should ever come home to a house without running water, because their family couldn’t keep up.
Jun 16, 2026
That’s why we’re going to keep working on this and reminding our colleagues in Congress, we have to get this done for every one of their constituents.
Jun 17, 2026
Not only was I not aware (of the indictment) But as soon as I saw it, I asked the FBI for a briefing, and they responded that it was an ongoing investigation and they could not (offer a briefing).





