this is an outrage. I do not know whether you are for or against gay marriage, and I do not think it makes a great deal of difference. I happen to oppose the idea. But this is an extraordinary piece of arrogance on the part of the House of Representatives to consider a piece of legislation which would strip American citizens of their right to access to court. Can you imagine anything more shameful than telling an American citizen you cannot go into court to have your concerns addressed, to have cases and controversies, many of which will arise under the Constitution, heard by the courts of your Nation? The right to access to courts to decide questions of policy is as old as the Magna Carta, and it is as important to us as anything else in the Constitution. Here we calmly say, you cannot have access to the courts, the Federal courts, the lower inferior courts, and the Supreme Court. Shame. Shame, shame, shame.…
Debbie Dingell: “this is an outrage. I do not know whether you are for or against gay marriage, and I do not think it makes a great deal…”
On the recordJuly 22, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing legislation that would limit citizens' access to the courts during a House debate.
Share
More from Debbie Dingell
Aug 27, 2026
Don't any reporter ask me again about Hasan Piker. It's not what November is about.
Jun 16, 2026
No senior living on a fixed income should worry that turning on the faucet could mean falling behind on their medication, and no child should ever come home to a house without running water, because their family couldn’t keep up.
May 27, 2026
We know that the majority of individuals who require long-term care would prefer to receive it in their own homes and communities. No one should have to wait years to get the care they deserve, and no care worker should have to live below…





