I have some further questions of the gentleman from Alaska, and they relate to the question of open until closed. Mr. Chairman, since the Resources Committee finished consideration of the legislation before us, considerable confusion has arisen over section 6 of the substitute. Specifically, I am referring to paragraph (3)(a)(2), which specifies that existing and compatible wildlife-dependent uses of a refuge are allowed to continue, on an interim basis, on lands added to the System once the legislation before us is enacted into law. Would the gentleman please explain to us the intention of this paragraph in section 6?
Debbie Dingell: “I have some further questions of the gentleman from Alaska, and they relate to the question of open until closed. Mr.…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the intention behind a specific section of legislation during a committee discussion.
Share
More from Debbie Dingell
as a former chair and proud member of the Congressional Sportsmen's Caucus, I have worked tirelessly to defend our public lands and wildlife for the benefit of all outdoor enthusiasts. I am here today on the floor to continue to fight for…
Today, we are witnessing an unprecedented extinction crisis with 1 million species at risk of disappearing forever in coming decades. As the co-chair of the Endangered Species Act Caucus, protecting our Nation's wildlife is one of my top…
if you think you are doing what is right for the American people, you don't consider it in the dead of night.
Let’s just call it Lake Natalie, so we know you’ll start protecting our Great Lakes,





