Mr. Chairman, term limits; if Members are for term limits and they really mean it and they want it to take effect immediately, this amendment is for them. If Members want term limits to take place in 19 years, 7 years for ratification, 12 years following, so that they can have a secure and happy career in this institution, then by all means oppose the amendment and by all means support the resolution as it is drawn. Mr. Chairman, this is a real test of the sincerity of those who say they are for term limits. If Members are sincere, support the amendment. If they are not, oppose it.
Debbie Dingell: “Mr. Chairman, term limits; if Members are for term limits and they really mean it and they want it to take effect…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating the sincerity of support for term limits in a committee discussion.
Share
More from Debbie Dingell
The Great Lakes are a shared treasure that generations of Americans and Canadians have worked together to protect.
Not only was I not aware (of the indictment) But as soon as I saw it, I asked the FBI for a briefing, and they responded that it was an ongoing investigation and they could not (offer a briefing).
I don’t appreciate being told we’re not doing enough when I f*cking voted on two war resolutions this week.
Let's stop wasting time on illegitimate messaging CRAs and work together to support innovation, build out the infrastructure, ensure access to affordable American-made vehicles, whether gas-powered, hybrid, or electric. Let's work together…





