I would observe that the Republicans have the full capability to move forward. We stand ready to assist them in moving forward on good legislation. I will observe that good legislation does, however, not embody the principle that we should pay the polluters for cleaning up. We should cause the polluters to pay, and we should not absolve those who have arrived at a settlement of the responsibility that they have achieved by having set at risk the health and the welfare and the well-being and the environment of the American people. Mr. Chairman, I would urge my colleagues then to reject the amendment offered by my good friend from New York, for whom I also have enormous respect, and to adopt the amendment offered by my good friend from Massachusetts because it says that the polluter pays, the polluter gets no break for his wrongdoing, whereas the gentleman from New York says that he might get some.
Debbie Dingell: “I would observe that the Republicans have the full capability to move forward. We stand ready to assist them in moving…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing environmental legislation and the principle of polluter pays.
Share
More from Debbie Dingell
Today, we are witnessing an unprecedented extinction crisis with 1 million species at risk of disappearing forever in coming decades. As the co-chair of the Endangered Species Act Caucus, protecting our Nation's wildlife is one of my top…
I have repeatedly urged the University to listen to the impacted community, be transparent, and answer basic questions about the impact of this project. Instead, they have rebuffed these concerns and are ignoring the pleas from residents…
if you think you are doing what is right for the American people, you don't consider it in the dead of night.
I urge my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to support H.R. 2449, and I yield back the balance of my time.





