Mr. Chairman, as the debate concludes, it is becoming painfully clear that this House is responding not to the needs of the country, but to the needs of doing a bunch of things in 100 days. I was a small boy when the Democrats dealt with the 100 days of the New Deal. Those were important times. The country was going broke. A third of our population was out of work. Better than a third of the country was ill-housed, ill-clothed, and ill-fed, according to the President. Homes and farms were being foreclosed. Businesses were going down the drain. The suicide rate was up. They responded in 100 days. However, there is nothing like that challenging the country at this time. What we are doing is rushing to pass an assortment of legislation ill-considered here, worse considered in committee. This legislation has never had hearings in the committee of jurisdiction. We are responding to a demand which is viewed on that side of the aisle as being very important. However, we are not considering the basic responsibility that we as Members of this body have, and that is to legislate well.
Editor's note · Context
Criticizing the rushed legislative process in the House during a debate.
Share
More from Debbie Dingell
I have repeatedly urged the University to listen to the impacted community, be transparent, and answer basic questions about the impact of this project. Instead, they have rebuffed these concerns and are ignoring the pleas from residents…
as a former chair and proud member of the Congressional Sportsmen's Caucus, I have worked tirelessly to defend our public lands and wildlife for the benefit of all outdoor enthusiasts. I am here today on the floor to continue to fight for…
They are firefighters, nurses, doctors, air traffic controllers, food inspectors, law enforcement, and public safety officials. They impact every part of our lives, and we take them for granted. We cannot hurt them. We must support them…





