I appreciate that language: to get back to what they tried to do in the first place. Let's look at what they did in the first place. Their bill, their original bill, said anyone who earned more than 400 percent of poverty--that's $93,800 for a family of four--would be required to repay the entire amount of the exchange subsidy. That is exactly what this bill does. This bill does what the original health care legislation did. Then they raised it, and said, well, if you made up to $117,000 for a family of four, you had to repay the entire subsidy. They had a cliff in their bill, and there is a cliff now. What we are saying is we need to see that the American taxpayer is protected.
Dave Camp: “I appreciate that language: to get back to what they tried to do in the first place. Let's look at what they did in the…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the implications of a health care bill regarding subsidy repayment thresholds.
Share
More from Dave Camp
I just want to thank the distinguished gentleman from Maryland for his remarks. This is a debate America needs to have and, hopefully, next year that debate will move forward. With that, I yield 3 minutes to the distinguished gentleman…
At this time, I yield 2 minutes to the distinguished gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Fitzpatrick).
I insert in the Record letters of support for the legislation from the American Association of Community Colleges and the Association of Community College Trustees, as well as the United States Student Association. American Association of…
I thank the distinguished chairman for yielding. Madam Speaker, the House passed their version of highway funding more than 2 weeks ago. The Senate acted last night. Because of their rush, there was actually a drafting error in the Senate…





