Three weeks ago we were here talking about this. Two months ago we were here talking about this. And even if this bill becomes law, in four months we will likely be back again talking about this. The specific subject is extended unemployment benefits. But the real issue, and what is driving the need for a record 99 weeks of unemployment benefits, is this Administration's woeful record when it comes to creating jobs that provide paychecks, instead of unemployment checks. In February 2009, the President signed into law the Democrats' trillion-dollar ``stimulus'' plan. That was the plan Democrats promised would create 3.7 million jobs, keep unemployment under 8 percent, and stimulate strong private sector job growth. None of that happened. Instead, over 2 million more jobs were lost and unemployment spiked to 10 percent, though the number of government jobs has grown somewhat. So here we are again--extending unemployment benefits because stimulus failed to create the millions of jobs Democrats promised. But instead of doing this responsibly, this bill will simply add another $34 billion to our $13 trillion mountain of debt. We can do better than this. Both Republicans and Democrats support helping the long-term unemployed. And both Republicans and Democrats want to responsibly pay for these benefits.
Dave Camp: “Three weeks ago we were here talking about this. Two months ago we were here talking about this. And even if this bill…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses the need for extended unemployment benefits and critiques the effectiveness of the stimulus plan.
Share
More from Dave Camp
I thank the distinguished chairman for yielding. Madam Speaker, the House passed their version of highway funding more than 2 weeks ago. The Senate acted last night. Because of their rush, there was actually a drafting error in the Senate…
I thank the gentleman from New York for those kind remarks and also for the work we have been able to do together over the years. I remember the first legislation that we really worked together on was the Adoption and Safe Families Act…
As we all know, there is a series of tax provisions that routinely expire that Congress must then renew, typically extending them for 1 year retroactively and 1 year prospectively. Congress routinely extends these policies without…
I feel compelled to correct the record here. The opponents make a false claim that somehow this bill eliminates benefits for millions of low-income families, and that is just wrong because the provision he is talking about is, frankly, the…





