Spending less than 3 percent of GDP on our domestic programs that provide support for public education, job training, medical research, nutritional assistance and so much more, frankly is unacceptable.
Editor's note · Context
Kildee criticizes proposed cuts to domestic programs in the budget.
Share
More from Dan Kildee
I was unable to attend votes due to a death in the family. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 87 (H.R. 4723) and ``yea'' on rollcall No. 88 (H. Res. 149). PERSONAL EXPLANATION
I was unable to attend votes due to a death in the family. Had I been present, I would have voted ``nay'' on rollcall No. 89 (Previous Question on H. Res. 1085), ``no'' on rollcall No. 90 (H. Res. 1085), ``yea'' on rollcall No. 91 (H.R…
Had I been present, I would have voted ``nay'' on rollcall No. 119, H.R. 7888. personal explanation
Obviously, our goal is to increase access to care, increase the quality of care, increase outcomes, and at the same time manage costs.





