I rise to oppose the Markey-Boehlert amendment to legislatively mandate increases in corporate average-fuel-economy standards. While I support the goal of improved fuel economy, this mandate is not the answer. Despite proposing significant CAFE increases in the amendment, the phase-in time is a little more than 2 model years. Furthermore, it takes away flexibility mechanisms that allow auto makers to respond to unexpected changes in consumer behavior. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is the appropriate venue for CAFE review. NHTSA must consider the safety trade-offs, utility impacts, and economic feasibility of any CAFE increase. The National Academy of Sciences outlines these trade-offs in its report released this week. It warned of overly ambitious CAFE increases with short implementation periods. NAS stated that quick significant increases would have a detrimental effect on vehicle safety and the health of the auto industry. If we adopt the Markey-Boehlert amendment, tens of thousands of jobs will be jeopardized as production plans are significantly disrupted. By comparison, the current bill takes the right approach by allowing NHTSA to determine the appropriate timetable and the appropriate fuel economy standard. The auto industry is the largest manufacturing industry in the United States. We must be judicious in our approach and mindful of unintended consequences. Vote no on the amendment.
On the recordAugust 1, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing the Markey-Boehlert amendment on corporate average-fuel-economy standards.
Share
More from Dan Kildee
Feb 6, 2024
this is not just about the fundamental question of human rights, but the economic interest of American workers.
Mar 19, 2024
I was unable to attend votes due to a death in the family. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 87 (H.R. 4723) and ``yea'' on rollcall No. 88 (H. Res. 149). PERSONAL EXPLANATION
Sep 12, 2024
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 217, nays 192, not voting 22, as follows: [Roll No. 417]…
Jun 25, 2024
Our Strengthening Evidence Based Prevention Services Act... is a really important step.





