in the debate about child nutrition in the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities we witnessed the triumph of ideology over practical public policy and the best interests of our children. The Republicans, who espouse a free-market economy, recently rejected my amendment to require States to use competitive bidding when purchasing infant formula for the WIC Program. Only one Republican had the courage to vote for my amendment. The only winners from this action are the big three infant formula companies. The losers are pregnant women and infants, many of whom will suffer from malnutrition or anemia, and the taxpayers who will get less efficient use of their tax dollars. Some would say that the States will continue to use competitive bidding. I would point out that fewer than half the States used competitive bidding prior to passage of the 1989 Federal law that required them to do so. When this amendment was adopted we found that it saved over $1 billion a year and enabled us to serve 1 million more pregnant women and infants a month. The committee voted to drop this requirement. Weakening cost containment measures will mean a less efficient, less effective program that gives taxpayers less return for their dollars but helps the three infant formula companies improve their balance sheets. Mr. Speaker, this program was designed to help poor women and children, not a few major corporations. Let us not take food out of the mouths of babies.
On the recordMarch 9, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing child nutrition policy and the impact of competitive bidding on the WIC Program.
Share
More from Dan Kildee
Apr 12, 2024
Had I been present, I would have voted ``nay'' on rollcall No. 119, H.R. 7888. personal explanation
Sep 18, 2024
In closing I will just say this: I hope my colleagues join me. This is something we ought to be able to do together. We ought to solve this problem in a bipartisan fashion. I ask you to join me in voting for the motion to recommit to right…
Jun 14, 2024
I thank the ranking member for allowing me to speak on my amendment. It is a bipartisan amendment expressing the sense of Congress that we should not permanently store nuclear waste near the Great Lakes. My amendment responds to the…





