while I vote in favor of the Reynolds/ Rogers Amendment today in support of a continued prohibition on Great Lakes offshore oil and gas drilling, I strongly believe that an outright ban on these activities is necessary. I am concerned that the Rules Committee would not allow into order a stronger amendment protecting our Great Lakes to be voted on by the House. Last year, I joined 2264 of my colleagues in supporting an amendment to the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act that would have banned any U.S. Army Corps of Engineers funds from being used to process or approve permits for drilling in or under the Great Lakes. This is the kind of positive action that is needed to ensure these treasures remain safe for future generations. While I support the Reynolds/Rogers Amendment to the Energy Policy Act of 2003, I believe much stronger action needs to be taken to protect the Great Lakes.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need for stronger protections against offshore drilling in the Great Lakes.
Share
More from Dan Kildee
We delivered on a commitment to do what we can to try to lower costs for Americans when it comes to their health care.
Obviously, our goal is to increase access to care, increase the quality of care, increase outcomes, and at the same time manage costs.
It makes a difference where the investment comes from and where the relationships are built, and if we defer to our adversaries, we have no ability, really, to have a meaningful impact on the continent.
I was unable to attend votes due to a death in the family. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 87 (H.R. 4723) and ``yea'' on rollcall No. 88 (H. Res. 149). PERSONAL EXPLANATION





