Political Quotes

On the recordMarch 2, 1995
In this contract hysteria, let us not lose sight of the things that came into being for a strong national purpose. The voters in November did not mandate the destruction of a program that has worked well for half a century. Repealing the National School Lunch Act, which has successfully fed hundreds of millions of hungry children since 1946, will affect children in public and parochial schools, regardless of income. In 1981, the Reagan administration slashed over $1 billion from the school nutrition programs. As a result, over 2,000 schools were forced to drop out of the program, leaving 2 million children without a nutritious school lunch. Under this block grant proposal, States would receive $2 billion less for school meals over the next 5 years. Due to drastically reduced funding, a State may choose not to subsidize meals for children who pay full price, forcing the school to raise prices.
Said by
Dan Kildee
Democratic · Michigan

Editor's note · Context

Addressing the impact of proposed cuts to the National School Lunch Act.

Share

More from Dan Kildee

May 7, 2024

What happened was Mr. Trump decided he'd rather, literally, he'd rather campaign on the issue than solve the issue.

congress.gov
Jun 25, 2024

It is really important to me, personally.

congress.gov
Jun 25, 2024

The entirety of the system should be pointed at bringing kids back to a permanent, loving, stable home.

congress.gov
Dec 18, 2024

I thank my friend, Representative Bishop, for yielding and for his work on this legislation. We do a lot of big, controversial bills. Sometimes, we can actually come together as Democrats and Republicans to get something done that serves…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation