Mr. Chairman, current law requires that services be provided to both in-school youth and out-of-school youth. Nothing in the Act prevents States from spending all of youth funds on out-of-school youths. In fact, as many as 17 States spend more than 30 percent on out-of-school programs. The majority of States are challenged by current out-of-school requirements. Eliminating services for in-school youth cuts funding for programs designed to keep youths in school, to develop workforce skills, to prepare for post-secondary education, and provide after school and summer opportunities. H.R. 27 limits the business community's ability to work with schools and prepare emerging workforces. In many communities, you have that cooperation between the business community and the schools. H.R. 27 restricts services for rural youths. Many rural in-school programs provide workforce development and on-school support service for students who are at risk for dropping out. I think it is very, very important that we maintain the in-school youth program, and that is the purpose for me offering this amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of H.R. 27 on in-school and out-of-school youth programs.
Share
More from Dan Kildee
I was unable to attend votes due to a death in the family. Had I been present, I would have voted ``nay'' on rollcall No. 89 (Previous Question on H. Res. 1085), ``no'' on rollcall No. 90 (H. Res. 1085), ``yea'' on rollcall No. 91 (H.R…
This legislation strengthens the Opportunity Zones with reporting requirements along with expanding incentives.
thanks to the Former Members of Congress Association for bringing us together and for being an opportunity for those who us who served here together to continue to enjoy one another's friendship and company. I am going to reference one of…
There are still two things that are mysteries to me: pro wrestling and CBO scoring.





