Carl Levin: “The amendment would not prohibit the Senator from Alaska from…”

On the recordMay 5, 1994

The amendment would not prohibit the Senator from Alaska from receiving fish, or other home State products, and distributing them to the public or Members as he sees fit, just as under the current law. As to the disclosure requirement, it only applies when you receive a home State product valued over $250, and that is not in this bill. That is under existing disclosure rules. That is not changed by this bill. So I do not think that the Senator has any concern in this regard.

Said by

Carl Levin

Democratic · Michigan

Source

govinfo.gov

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the implications of an amendment related to home State products and disclosure requirements.

Share on X Share on Facebook Email this quote

More from Carl Levin

Feb 5, 2021

I would just point out that the grants in Title II do not have mandatory partners. They require partners to the extent practicable in a given situation. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Mrvan), a member of…

govinfo.gov

Feb 6, 2020

I claim the time in opposition to this amendment. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.

govinfo.gov

Jan 10, 2020

I am prepared to close, and I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Chair, while people may have all kinds of opinions on the underlying issue, this amendment is simply about sunshine. It simply is about good government: Will our…

govinfo.gov

Feb 6, 2020

Woman, I rise in opposition to this amendment. The Acting Chair (Ms. Pingree). The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.

govinfo.gov

View all Carl Levin quotes

Other voices in this conversation

Carl Levin: “The amendment would not prohibit the Senator from Alaska from receiving fish, or other home State products, and…”

Editor's note · Context