There is no criminal prosecution under this substitute that the committee has adopted. It is an Ethics Committee enforcement, as our current rules are, unlike the Lautenberg-Wellstone bill originally which had Justice Department enforcement. The committee bill drops that and instead lodges it into the hands of the Ethics Committee which I do not think is going to unfairly pursue any Senator. I have enough confidence in the Ethics Committee to think they are fair indeed. But the main point of my friend from Texas, it seems to me, has to do with the question of legal expense funds and that is what I really want to comment on. The committee substitute, unlike the original bill that Senators Lautenberg and Wellstone introduced, permits contributions to a legal defense fund from anybody except registered lobbyists.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing changes to the committee bill regarding prosecution and legal expense funds.
Share
More from Carl Levin
This amendment is truly amazing to me as a longtime union organizer. It seeks to undermine the freedom of contract, the ability of employers and unions to agree on how to handle a situation freely together. The shock of giving the…
I rise with a message on the passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg that I shared with my beloved synagogue, Congregation T'chiyah, on Zoom during Saturday's Rosh Hashanah service just before we said the Mourner's Kaddish. We have to…
May I inquire of the time remaining. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Michigan has 16\3/4\ minutes remaining. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has 13\1/2\ minutes remaining.
My amendment alters the charging and fueling infrastructure grant program in this bill, laying the groundwork to deploy zero-emission EV charging infrastructure nationwide. This amendment strengthens plans for renewable or zero-emissions…





