That is a pretty high bar between the requirement for specific names and proof of affirmative deceptive acts, the way the Swiss define it.
Carl Levin: “That is a pretty high bar between the requirement for specific names and proof of affirmative deceptive acts, the way…”
Editor's note · Context
Levin discusses the challenges posed by the Swiss tax treaty for obtaining account information.
Share
More from Carl Levin
I claim the time in opposition to this amendment. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
I thank Representative Pressley for being such a great champion for workers in Massachusetts and in our whole country. Madam Speaker, I now yield to the gentlewoman from Illinois (Ms. Schakowsky).
I would just point out that the grants in Title II do not have mandatory partners. They require partners to the extent practicable in a given situation. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Mrvan), a member of…
I am prepared to close, and I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Chair, while people may have all kinds of opinions on the underlying issue, this amendment is simply about sunshine. It simply is about good government: Will our…





