There is a proposal, however, that is acceptable to me as one Member that we keep the current limit of $250 on a gift from any source with a waiver possible from the Ethics Committee. That is the current rule which is that you have a maximum of $250 from any source, but you can then go and get a waiver. That is acceptable to me if it is acceptable to the body. I have no problems with that. Now, Senator Stevens said he would want to be on the floor if that were offered so he could exclude the spouse and dependents. But I can go either way on this one, either the close personal friend. You can have a gift without that limit if in your judgment it is a close personal friend, or we can restore the current limit of $250 and then have to go to the Ethics Committee for waivers over that $250.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing gift limits and waivers in relation to ethics rules.
Share
More from Carl Levin
Let me just explain a little more for folks at home who may not be obviously reading all of the details of this, the many pages of this bill, what we are talking about. This is about who is eligible to apply for grants, certain grants…
It is great to stand here with Representative Bowman, with our colleague Jan Schakowsky, with Mr. Kahele, with all of our brothers and sisters in Congress to say that we can and we must, and we will do so much better right now for our…
I have an amendment at the desk. The CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Page 12, line 18, after the dollar amount, insert ``(reduced by $1,000,000)(increased by $1,000,000)''. The CHAIR…
Woman, the real motives are revealed in the rhetoric. This is an attack on unions themselves. The way that our labor relations have been organized since the 1930s when the Wagner Act was passed is that private-sector labor relations are…





