Putting into the Constitution language which is full of loopholes is not an improvement on the current situation. Quite the opposite. It will lead the public into believing we are doing something when we are not. In doing that, it will lead the public to new depths of cynicism. It will take Congress and the President off the hook until 2002. That will give Congress and the President 7 years more for excuses not to act. They will act on the illusion that the amendment will somehow do it for us. This amendment will, as a result, do damage during the next 7 years with great uncertainty as to what will happen thereafter. There is no substitute for the exercise of will now to cut the deficit. Putting off the fateful day until 2002, and then being uncertain as to whether there will be any deficit reduction is not the exercise of will. It is a copout in the name of the Constitution. Our Constitution deserves better. Our people deserve better.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker criticizes a proposed constitutional amendment regarding budget deficits.
Share
More from Carl Levin
Americans want to know that government officials don't have conflicts of interest swaying their decisions. For example, did they fundraise from an industry that they will regulate? Might they take it easy on that industry as a result? H.R…
The tired rhetoric about big labor, big labor, big labor, the organizations that workers create and pay for themselves to advocate their interests; yes, there is a lot of support for this bill from the labor movement. This bill is also…
First, I include in the Record a letter from the Manufacturing Institute in support of the bill. Manufacturing Institute, February 2, 2021. Hon. Bobby Scott, Chairman of Ed & Labor Committee, House of Representatives, Washington, DC. Hon…
I rise with a message on the passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg that I shared with my beloved synagogue, Congregation T'chiyah, on Zoom during Saturday's Rosh Hashanah service just before we said the Mourner's Kaddish. We have to…





