It means the current Senate rule has the same problem which my friend from Alaska describes. The current Senate rule applies to spouses. Do we have a constitutional right to apply that rule to spouses or to dependents? The answer is that is the same problem in the current Senate rule. That is not a new problem added by this language. That is the current Senate rule which says ``no Member, officer or employee of the Senate, or the spouse or the dependent thereof shall knowingly accept,'' et cetera. But that is the current language.
Carl Levin: “It means the current Senate rule has the same problem which my friend from Alaska describes. The current Senate rule…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the current Senate rule regarding spouses and dependents.
Share
More from Carl Levin
For 2 months, Donald Trump used the biggest megaphone in the world to organize a campaign of outright lies to overturn a free and fair election. On January 6, he summoned and incited a mob of domestic terrorists to fight like hell and sent…
I am prepared to close, and I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Chair, while people may have all kinds of opinions on the underlying issue, this amendment is simply about sunshine. It simply is about good government: Will our…
I claim the time in opposition to this amendment. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
I thank Representative Pressley for being such a great champion for workers in Massachusetts and in our whole country. Madam Speaker, I now yield to the gentlewoman from Illinois (Ms. Schakowsky).





