It means the current Senate rule has the same problem which my friend from Alaska describes. The current Senate rule applies to spouses. Do we have a constitutional right to apply that rule to spouses or to dependents? The answer is that is the same problem in the current Senate rule. That is not a new problem added by this language. That is the current Senate rule which says ``no Member, officer or employee of the Senate, or the spouse or the dependent thereof shall knowingly accept,'' et cetera. But that is the current language.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the current Senate rule regarding spouses and dependents.
Share
More from Carl Levin
I have an amendment at the desk. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Page 123, line 14, insert ``, and partner with a labor or joint labor-management organization''…
Americans want to know that government officials don't have conflicts of interest swaying their decisions. For example, did they fundraise from an industry that they will regulate? Might they take it easy on that industry as a result? H.R…
I wish to emphasize the importance of apprenticeship standards that safeguard apprentices' welfare with unions who have helped negotiate and protect them for many, many years. These standards are critically important to the success of the…
I want to thank Chairman Pallone for his tremendous work on this bill and all the staff of the Energy and Commerce Committee who worked on this. My amendment modifies H.R. 2's pilot program to improve lab infrastructure, ensuring grants…





