On the recordApril 15, 2010
But they are serious enough that enforcement action was needed because management was not addressing it. Is that a fair conclusion?
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Levin emphasizes the need for enforcement action due to management's inaction on identified issues.
Share
More from Carl Levin
Feb 5, 2021
The tired rhetoric about big labor, big labor, big labor, the organizations that workers create and pay for themselves to advocate their interests; yes, there is a lot of support for this bill from the labor movement. This bill is also…
Feb 5, 2021
I would just point out that the grants in Title II do not have mandatory partners. They require partners to the extent practicable in a given situation. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Mrvan), a member of…
Feb 5, 2021
May I inquire as to how much time remains. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Michigan has 9\1/2\ minutes remaining. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has 3\1/4\ minutes remaining.
Feb 6, 2020
Woman, the real motives are revealed in the rhetoric. This is an attack on unions themselves. The way that our labor relations have been organized since the 1930s when the Wagner Act was passed is that private-sector labor relations are…
Other voices in this conversation
