That is a proposed amendment, to have the same $250 limit in the bill before us, as currently exists under the rules. Someone has proposed that we have that same $250 limit subject to the waiver of the Ethics Committee which we have under the current rules. I am willing to accept that amendment. It seems to me that is reasonable. But as the language reads right now, there is no such limit.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to a $250 limit in a legislative bill.
Share
More from Carl Levin
My amendment alters the charging and fueling infrastructure grant program in this bill, laying the groundwork to deploy zero-emission EV charging infrastructure nationwide. This amendment strengthens plans for renewable or zero-emissions…
This amendment would strike the bill's provision that allows unions to collect a fair-share fee for services they are legally required to provide, and create, in its place, a national right-to-freeload scheme. This is a blatant attempt to…
I would inquire if I have time remaining or has my time expired. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The time of the gentleman from Michigan has expired. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to House Resolution 1224, the previous question is ordered on…
Woman, I will close by saying that I really appreciate our ability to take this small step, but I think we ought to all dream big for this beautiful part of our country. Puerto Rico has been subject to misfortunes, and we can think about a…





