On the recordApril 22, 2010
Well, that is not the part of the testimony he finally acknowledged, which is they were short of resources and didn't get what they requested.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Levin emphasizes the lack of resources acknowledged in testimony.
Share
More from Carl Levin
Mar 9, 2021
This amendment would strike the bill's provision that allows unions to collect a fair-share fee for services they are legally required to provide, and create, in its place, a national right-to-freeload scheme. This is a blatant attempt to…
Feb 5, 2021
I would just point out that the grants in Title II do not have mandatory partners. They require partners to the extent practicable in a given situation. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Mrvan), a member of…
Mar 9, 2021
Later today we will debate the PRO Act, and we will pass the PRO Act to free up American workers to form unions and bargain collectively just because they darn well please without interference from their employer. And when we debate the…
Feb 5, 2021
This amendment changes the word ``and'' to ``or,'' as my colleague from Arkansas pointed out, and it may seem like a small change. But, instead, it inadvertently could take away the employers' seat at the table for apprenticeship grant…
Other voices in this conversation
