But if that cannot be done or is not done this year, why not take the revenues from these loopholes which have no economic purpose, other than tax avoidance, and take that revenue to end sequestration?
Carl Levin: “But if that cannot be done or is not done this year, why not take the revenues from these loopholes which have no…”
Editor's note · Context
Levin emphasizes the need to utilize tax loophole revenues to address sequestration.
Share
More from Carl Levin
I thank the chairman so much for his leadership. Madam Speaker, at base, what we are talking about here is whether workers in this country are free to come together and form a union. All of these amendments are designed to undermine that…
I claim the time in opposition to this amendment. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
I thank my colleague for yielding. The threshold question for any NAFTA replacement must be whether it will finally stop the outflow of American jobs and raise the standard of living for Mexican, Canadian, and, of course, American workers…
It incentivizes companies to ship jobs to Mexico and out of our communities like mine in southeast Michigan. Mexico has not demonstrated the will, meaningfully, to reform its labor system, and the weakness of USMCA's enforcement mechanisms…





