On the recordMarch 31, 2014
If the value of the CACO transfer was treated the same as CSARL's intangibles were, as claimed by Pricewaterhouse, doesn't that create a huge tax liability?
Source
congress.govCarl Levin: “If the value of the CACO transfer was treated the same as CSARL's intangibles were, as claimed by Pricewaterhouse…”
Editor's note · Context
Levin questions the tax implications of valuing CACO transfers like CSARL's intangibles.
Share
More from Carl Levin
Mar 2, 2021
Americans want to know that government officials don't have conflicts of interest swaying their decisions. For example, did they fundraise from an industry that they will regulate? Might they take it easy on that industry as a result? H.R…
Jun 30, 2020
My amendment alters the charging and fueling infrastructure grant program in this bill, laying the groundwork to deploy zero-emission EV charging infrastructure nationwide. This amendment strengthens plans for renewable or zero-emissions…
Nov 20, 2020
This week, we learned that one of the biggest offshore wind developers in the world entered into an agreement with North America's Building Trades Unions of this country to develop apprenticeships and training programs for all the offshore…
Mar 9, 2021
I include in the Record a letter of support for the bill from the AFL-CIO. Legislative Alert AFL-CIO, Washington, DC, March 8, 2021. Dear Representative: On January 26, we wrote in support of the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act…
Other voices in this conversation
