On the recordNovember 2, 2011
We are, but it is a very different issue from the battles which we have been waging here to try to protect taxpayers and the Treasury from companies that are too big to fail.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Levin discusses the need to protect taxpayers from failing companies.
Share
More from Carl Levin
Mar 9, 2021
I wish I had time to rebut many arguments, like the one we just heard. The requirement that the employer share lists of the employees during a union election is decades and decades old. It hasn't changed. In any event, I am here to support…
Mar 9, 2021
Later today we will debate the PRO Act, and we will pass the PRO Act to free up American workers to form unions and bargain collectively just because they darn well please without interference from their employer. And when we debate the…
Feb 5, 2021
May I inquire of the time remaining. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Michigan has 16\3/4\ minutes remaining. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has 13\1/2\ minutes remaining.
Mar 2, 2021
Americans want to know that government officials don't have conflicts of interest swaying their decisions. For example, did they fundraise from an industry that they will regulate? Might they take it easy on that industry as a result? H.R …
Other voices in this conversation
