It seems to me that is inconsistent with the premise of deferral because the company has no tax residence anywhere else that is making a tax claim.
Carl Levin: “It seems to me that is inconsistent with the premise of deferral because the company has no tax residence anywhere else…”
Editor's note · Context
Levin critiques the incoherence of the tax system regarding Apple's subsidiaries.
Share
More from Carl Levin
I would just point out that the grants in Title II do not have mandatory partners. They require partners to the extent practicable in a given situation. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Mrvan), a member of…
First, let me thank Chairman Scott for his leadership and for bringing this exceptional reauthorization to the floor today. Before I begin speaking about this amendment, I would like to acknowledge the important role that labor unions have…
This amendment would strike the bill's provision that allows unions to collect a fair-share fee for services they are legally required to provide, and create, in its place, a national right-to-freeload scheme. This is a blatant attempt to…
I rise on behalf of the public schools in Macomb and Oakland Counties. In between votes earlier this week, I hosted a Zoom call with the superintendents in my district. I was struck by how much they figured out in such a short time about…





