On the recordMay 20, 2013
It seems to me that is inconsistent with the premise of deferral because the company has no tax residence anywhere else that is making a tax claim.
Source
congress.govCarl Levin: “It seems to me that is inconsistent with the premise of deferral because the company has no tax residence anywhere else…”
Editor's note · Context
Levin critiques the incoherence of the tax system regarding Apple's subsidiaries.
Share
More from Carl Levin
Dec 19, 2019
I thank my colleague for yielding. The threshold question for any NAFTA replacement must be whether it will finally stop the outflow of American jobs and raise the standard of living for Mexican, Canadian, and, of course, American workers…
Jan 10, 2020
I am prepared to close, and I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Chair, while people may have all kinds of opinions on the underlying issue, this amendment is simply about sunshine. It simply is about good government: Will our…
Feb 5, 2021
I would just point out that the grants in Title II do not have mandatory partners. They require partners to the extent practicable in a given situation. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Mrvan), a member of…
Jan 10, 2020
May I inquire how much time I have remaining. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Michigan has 45 seconds remaining.
Other voices in this conversation
