On the recordFebruary 1, 2010
Supporters of this policy argue that allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly would damage unit cohesion and morale, crucial factors in building combat effectiveness.
Source
congress.govCarl Levin: “Supporters of this policy argue that allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly would damage unit cohesion and morale…”
Editor's note · Context
Levin counters claims that DADT protects military cohesion.
Share
More from Carl Levin
Feb 6, 2020
Woman, I rise in opposition to this amendment. The Acting Chair (Ms. Pingree). The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
Feb 5, 2020
I thank Representative Pressley for being such a great champion for workers in Massachusetts and in our whole country. Madam Speaker, I now yield to the gentlewoman from Illinois (Ms. Schakowsky).
Jan 10, 2020
May I inquire how much time I have remaining. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Michigan has 45 seconds remaining.
Feb 5, 2021
I would just point out that the grants in Title II do not have mandatory partners. They require partners to the extent practicable in a given situation. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Mrvan), a member of…
Other voices in this conversation
