I think it is just way too ambiguous.
Carl Levin: “I think it is just way too ambiguous.”
Editor's note · Context
Levin criticizes the ambiguity in the requirements for indefinite reinvestment.
Share
More from Carl Levin
I claim the time in opposition to this amendment. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
I thank Representative Pressley for being such a great champion for workers in Massachusetts and in our whole country. Madam Speaker, I now yield to the gentlewoman from Illinois (Ms. Schakowsky).
It incentivizes companies to ship jobs to Mexico and out of our communities like mine in southeast Michigan. Mexico has not demonstrated the will, meaningfully, to reform its labor system, and the weakness of USMCA's enforcement mechanisms…
I am prepared to close, and I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Chair, while people may have all kinds of opinions on the underlying issue, this amendment is simply about sunshine. It simply is about good government: Will our…





