On the recordMay 5, 1994
Let me read the exact language: ``No Member, officer, or employee of the Senate, or the spouse or dependent thereof.'' It is exactly the same language as the current rule.
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing Senate rules during a floor debate.
Share
More from Carl Levin
Mar 9, 2021
This amendment is truly amazing to me as a longtime union organizer. It seeks to undermine the freedom of contract, the ability of employers and unions to agree on how to handle a situation freely together. The shock of giving the…
Feb 6, 2020
Woman, this amendment is a naked attempt to undermine unions by making it harder to collect reasonable fees for the services that they are required by law to perform. Unions have a legal obligation to represent and advocate for all members…
Feb 6, 2020
Woman, the real motives are revealed in the rhetoric. This is an attack on unions themselves. The way that our labor relations have been organized since the 1930s when the Wagner Act was passed is that private-sector labor relations are…
Feb 5, 2021
I look forward to discussing with my colleague a program that allows workers to unionize in the United States as freely as they do in Europe, and we achieve the same level of unionization those countries with larger numbers of…
Other voices in this conversation
