Just to address a couple of things: This bill clearly says it will add Form CRS to the list of exempted disclosures that would not require SEC investor testing. It has nothing to do with cryptocurrencies unless, somehow, magically, a crypto broker appears. There is no such thing. It has no application. This amendment is only going to be narrow. It is going to exempt Form CRS from having to go through this again. The author of the bill had said that he had no interest in relitigating current rulemaking. Here is the opportunity to prove it because, I would hope, Mr. Chairman, that we would all agree that Form CRS does not need to be subject to further testing. It has been 7 years. I don't want it to be another 7 years. As my colleague from Indiana earlier was saying, 600 rules at 6 months per rule is 300 years. We don't have that time. Mr. Chair, I hope that my colleagues would support my amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Share & report
More from Bill Huizenga
I include in the Record the following letters, a June 14 letter from the National Association of Manufacturers, a June 15 letter from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and a June 16 letter from the American Securities Association, all in…
Virtually every Federal agency, including the IRS and the Social Security Administration, have moved to electronic delivery. Why? Because older Americans have rapidly adopted internet technology in recent years, including 96 percent of…
I appreciate the gentleman yielding time and his leadership on this. Madam Speaker, every day capital markets are under attack here with this Securities and Exchange Commission. The climate disclosure rule, which was released in March of…
I have an amendment made in order by the rule. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Page 626, line 2, strike ``and''. Page 626, after line 2, insert the following (and…





