I thank my colleague and friend for yielding. Nobody is opposed to the idea of investor testing of SEC disclosure documents. By the way, neither is the SEC. They just proved that, as we know, from their testing of Form CRS. What I am opposed to, and I believe the gentlewoman is opposed to, is a testing loop. You test and refine, test-refine, test-refine. What is happening in between those time periods? What does it revert back to? And we can get into a death spiral or paralysis by analysis sometimes. Not that we don't have the best intentions and have the SEC move forward, we just need closure. Again, cost is a part of the access, but timeliness is part of access for everybody as well, and I am just afraid that with what we could get into we are going to be in this testing loop.
Share & report
More from Bill Huizenga
I thank Chairman McHenry for yielding me time this afternoon. I rise today in support of the Credit Union Board Modernization Act and ask for its immediate passage. Credit unions can play an important role in many of our local communities…
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: At the end of the bill (before the short title), insert the following: Sec. __. None of the funds…
I appreciate the gentleman yielding. The short-term stop-gap government funding measure we are debating here today not only keeps our government open, which is very important, it responsibly reduces spending, makes critical reforms to…
Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall no. 10. Stated against:





