I think it reflects a sense of desperation. I think what Senator Dole and the cosponsors of the amendment are indicating is that they have looked at all the options, there does not seem to be any other options and, therefore, let us take this one last act of desperation on behalf of people who are being slaughtered. This act of desperation has been precipitated by the absence of a policy. We do not have a policy, not one that has been clearly conceived and articulated and certainly not one that has been articulated with any degree of coherence. Who, for example, is speaking for the administration? Is it the Secretary of Defense? Is it the Secretary of State? Is it the National Security Adviser, Mr. Lake? Is it the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff? Who speaks for the administration? Well, ultimately, only the President can speak for the administration. And yet we have had conflicting statements and policy suggestions expressed to the public by each of the individuals I have mentioned.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the lack of a coherent U.S. policy in response to international crises.
Share
More from William Cohen
It's not easy and it's not quick. I think it's going to take quite a bit of time in order to do that. But the Israelis are going to have to go in at some point in time and dig out Hamas and take their leaders and remove them, and destroy…
I think every veteran who sees that or reads that, or to keep that in mind this coming next year and say, never vote for a president of the United States who has such contempt and such disrespect for the courage and the valor of the people…
I think we are sending a message to whoever sent this up, whether it was China or Russia, or some other country, if you invade in our airspace, we're going to take it out.
He has given away secrets in the past, he will do so in the future. And this case, here, he is being given the benefit of the doubt. How much more evidence do we need of his misbehavior?





