And if the President is going to continue to be the Commander in Chief and if he is going to continue to rightfully complain through his Secretary of Defense about the adverse effect of sequestration on our national defense capabilities, and I believe those concerns are legitimate, then I pray that Barack Obama, as Commander in Chief, will propose a specific bill that is introduced in the House of Representatives with some semblance of support, if not bipartisan, at least by Democrats, that details what his plan is so that the American people can see it and they can digest it and decide where they want to go with it.
ROBERT HALE: “And if the President is going to continue to be the Commander in Chief and if he is going to continue to rightfully…”
Editor's note · Context
Calls for a specific bill from Obama addressing sequestration's impact on defense.
Share
More from ROBERT HALE
We hope that Congress will enact this deficit reduction plan, or an alternative that the President can sign, and then repeal sequestration.
The most important reason that we need to do this, to achieve auditable financial statements, is public confidence.
If we find ourselves taking $52 billion out of that request, as would be required if there is no changes in the Budget Control Act, then the suddenness of that decline will cause serious problems.
We have got at least 25 percent of unneeded infrastructure in the Department of Defense. If we can't get Congress to allow us to close it, we are simply going to waste taxpayers' dollars.





